Diddy Jury Verdict Sheet Reveals How Prosecutors Suffered A Major Loss With An Almost Clean Sweep

The verdict sheet submitted by jurors in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex crimes trial has surfaced days after the rapper was acquitted of the top charges.

Diddy was charged with two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution and two counts of sex trafficking and racketeering.

However, after an 8-week trial, Sean "Diddy" Combs was found not guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking, and the newly released verdict sheet shows prosecutors lost by almost a clean sweep.

Diddy's verdict sheet has emerged, revealing how the 12-member jury voted in his recently concluded sex crimes trial.

Listed as Count One on the sheet was the racketeering conspiracy charge, which required jurors to indicate which types of racketeering acts they believed Diddy was involved in.

According to the legal documents obtained by TMZ, for the first count, the jurors selected none of the options and only checked the "Not Guilty" box under the charge.

Next were Counts Two and Three, involving sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution in connection with Cassie. Here, the jury found Diddy not guilty of sex trafficking but guilty of transporting her for prostitution, a charge also known as the Mann Act.

Counts Four and Five involved the same charges but related to another alleged victim, referred to as Jane. The jurors delivered a similar verdict to that of the Cassie-related charges.

Despite being found not guilty of the major charges, Diddy is still expected to serve prison time for the two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, for which he was found guilty.

Each of these charges carries a potential maximum sentence of 10 years, with the final outcome to be determined by sentencing guidelines recommended by the attorneys involved in the case.

However, the prosecution and defense are divided on how those guidelines should be applied. Diddy's defense argues that sentencing should start at 21 months, while prosecutors are pushing for 51 months.

Although the guidelines the judge will follow remain unclear, a sentencing date has been agreed upon by both parties.

The judge had originally proposed October 3, but attorneys agreed to move the date up to September 22. Ultimately, a final decision was reached during a pre-sentencing hearing on Tuesday, July 8, moving the date for the rapper's sentencing back to October 3.

Following the verdict, Diddy was hit with two new civil suits, adding to the over 60 suits he now has to contend with.

One was filed by a male escort named Clayton Howard and named the rapper's ex, Cassie.

In the lawsuit, obtained by TMZ, he claimed they trafficked him for commercial sex, which he described as "entertainment to satisfy their sexual fetishes and personal ambitions."

Even worse, he alleged that he was drugged, manipulated, and traumatized by the duo, whom he described as being involved in a toxic and abusive relationship, as supported by reports from Diddy's trial.

A person identified as John Doe also filed a lawsuit against Diddy after his partial victory, accusing him of sexual battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and other offenses, according to TMZ.

In one part of the filing, the individual claimed Diddy pressured him to take the drug ketamine during a listening session for a Biggie Smalls project.

He further alleged that Diddy m-sturbated in front of him using one of Biggie's shirts, then threw the semen-covered shirt at him.

The complaint also stated that Diddy once forcibly shoved his genitals in the man's face and told him to "suck it."

Despite the increasing number of civil suits, Diddy has declared his readiness to fight them all.

His lawyer, Erica Wolff, issued a statement after the verdict, noting that the rapper "will not back down" and is seeking "full vindication," according to The New York Times.

She also claimed that the jury's decision in the sex crimes trial is proof that the rapper is innocent of the allegations in his numerous civil suits.

The outcome helped prove "what we have been saying about the civil cases since day one: they are all fabricated attempts to extort windfall payments from an innocent man," the attorney emphasized.

"Mr. Combs never sexually assaulted or trafficked anyone," she added. "From the beginning, we have vigorously defended against the civil plaintiffs' made-up claims with full confidence that Mr. Combs would prevail in the criminal case, and he did."