PETA Enlists Stormy Daniels For Anti-Horse Racing PSA With A Brutal Donald Trump Jab

PETA wants to collaborate with Stormy Daniels for an upcoming ad campaign that seeks to discourage horse racing.

The public service announcement is set to take a swipe at former president Donald Trump following Daniels' past confession that he didn't last up to 2 minutes when they allegedly engaged in a one-night stand.

Trump has been accused of falsifying company records to cover up an alleged $130k payment to Daniels for her to remain mute about their sexual encounter.

According to TMZ, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) wants to join forces with Stormy Daniels in a new ad campaign that seeks to sensitize against horse racing.

The NGO made their intentions known in a letter sent to her, promising to take a major jab against Donald Trump, who Daniels stands as a witness in his ongoing hush money trial.

In a past sex confession, the former adult film star alleged that Trump didn't last up to two minutes when they made out, and that's what PETA wants to use to drive their message against horse racing home.

"Nobody likes a two-minute ride. Turn your back on horse racing cruelty," a tagline on the mockup of the ad read.

While calling on Daniels to use her platform for a good cause, PETA decried the horror horses go through at the hands of humans, all for the sake of entertainment and business.

"Every week, an average of 24 horses shatter bones and die at racetracks across the country, and the distressing number of deaths continues to mount. Last year alone, 16 horses died at Churchill Downs in the weeks leading to the Kentucky Derby," they noted.

The organization, which is committed to ending the abusive treatment of animals in business and society, went on to praise Daniels for speaking out against Trump while encouraging her to make a difference should she choose to do the campaign.

Daniel stood as a key witness in the former president's hush money trial, where he's been accused of falsifying financial records to cover up a payment he made to her.

The trial enters its closing stages as lawyers are expected to make their closing arguments in court today.

Members of the jury will then come up with a verdict, which can potentially make history as Trump could become the first U.S. ex-president to be convicted for a crime if found guilty.

Seemingly taking a dig at the presumptive GOP candidate for the November elections, Daniels slammed him for not taking the stand in the trial.

"Real men respond to testimony by being sworn in and taking the stand in court. Oh...wait. Nevermind," Daniels wrote on X (formerly Twitter).

Several Trump supporters took to the comment section of her post to knock her, with many of them calling the trial "fake."

"Not sure anyone cares what a porn star says the definition of a 'real man' is," a fan said.

Another fan wrote that Daniels "would not know a 'real man' if she saw one," adding that she has "no credibility" and that they hoped "Trump sues her for breaking their 2 NDAs and for defaming him."

However, a handful of other users commended Daniels for her bravery in speaking out against the ex-president.

"Proud of you. [Your] testimony was outstanding, honest, and believable," one X user noted.

Another added, "He's afraid of you, Stormy!... all the MAGAs are!"

Daniels' lawyer, Keith Davidson, also testified during the trial and said that the $130,000 payment was not a "payoff."

Davidson testified it was his "understanding" that Trump and Daniels had already made out when she denied it in a 2018 letter but that the $130,000 payment Trump allegedly paid to buy her silence about the affair "wasn't a payoff."

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass then asked him if he understood at the time that his client had "in fact, had a sexual encounter with Donald Trump at some point?"

"That was my understanding," Davidson replied.

He then proceeded to note that the $130k payment Daniels received to silence her about the alleged affair "wasn't a payoff, and it wasn't hush money," noting that he'd prefer to call it a "consideration."