Jeffrey Epstein Allegedly Had Info That Would Have Halted The 2016 Election

Mark Epstein claimed his late brother, Jeffrey Epstein, possessed explosive information on Donald Trump and the Clintons during the 2016 election.

Epstein's close ties with Trump in the '90s are noted, as is Clinton's friendship with him. Court documents may identify Clinton in the case, but no compromising tapes have surfaced. Chaos surrounds the release of Epstein's associates' names due to a woman's safety concerns.

The list, part of a 2015 lawsuit, was almost delayed after a woman, identified as Jane Doe, claimed that her life would be at risk if the documents were ever made public.

Mark Epstein, the younger brother of disgraced and deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein, claimed that his brother possessed explosive information on Donald Trump and the Clintons during the 2016 presidential election.

According to Mark, during an interview with theNew York Post, Jeffrey stated, "If I said what I know about both candidates, they'd have to cancel the election." However, Mark declined to provide details, emphasizing that his brother never disclosed the specifics.

Before his tragic passing, Jeffrey and Trump were close in the 90's and took trips, flying on his private jet. On the other hand, Clinton also maintained a friendship with Epstein, visiting each other frequently, including 17 times at the White House.

Recently released court documents have identified Bill Clinton as the "John Doe 36" concerning the Epstein case. Per the documents, the former president appears in the documents approximately 50 times.

Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, who was his right hand and co-conspirator, allegedly asserted that Epstein possessed compromising tapes of Trump and Clinton.

During a 2016 interview, former "60 Minutes" producer Ira Rosen alleged in his book, "Ticking Clock: Behind the Scenes at 60 Minutes," Maxwell stated, "If you get the tapes on Trump, you have to do Clinton." However, no such tapes have been revealed.

The release of the much-anticipated Epstein's list containing Epstein's associates and high profile has caused chaos due to a woman, identified as "John Doe 107," expressing concerns about her safety in her "culturally conservative country."

The planned disclosure of the names previously faced uncertainty after the woman was granted a 30-day appeal by Judge Loretta Preska on December 21.

This delay extends until January 22, during which the woman must "submit an affidavit to prove the risk she says she will be subjected to, in addition to proof of 'hate mail' she claims she has received."

However, the delays clearly did not apply to the entire list, as the document has now been unsealed, with names revealed.

Alan Dershowitz, a former Epstein associate, also supports the release of the documents and advocates for transparency. He expressed a desire for full disclosure, stating: 'The reason I wanted everything put out– and I don't think the judge put everything out, I think she was selective in what she put out and that's unfair."

He continued: "1 want everything out, every document, every piece of paper, half-truths or lies, and I wanted them out for personal reasons because I know that they would prove what I've said from day one, that I did nothing wrong, and the woman who accused me later admitted that she may have misidentified me, confused me with someone else."

He added: "So I wanted everything out right from the beginning because I have nothing to hide... There are some people who may be ashamed of the fact that they hung out with Epstein but remember a lot of people hung out with Epstein before he was convicted."