Can we separate the woman from the artist? This question has been asked so many times, and for most of them, It’s because the artist has done something very wrong that shocked a part of the population. An example of this situation can be J.K Rowling and the accusations of transphobia towards her, or Kanye West and his antisemitic remarks. Now after reading the title with Onlyfans in it, you might wonder why we can use this sentence for this particular situation. Well, It’s because It fits perfectly with our story of the day.
Victoria Triece is a 31-year-old mom who has been making a living out of OnlyFans for a couple of years now. But even though she does this job to pay her bills, It doesn’t mean that she’s not a loving mom and even a loving person in general. It’s even the contrary because she has been asking to do some volunteering for her son’s school. But unfortunately, she has been banned from doing it because of her job on this adult website. This story might seem familiar to you, and most of the time, women like Victoria nod to that kind of situation and just hope that one day this will be recognized as a real job. But this time, this is not what happened, because she decided to sue the Orange County district over that banishment. Will she succeed in her approach? Let’s find out.
Voir cette publication sur Instagram
What is Orange County Accused of?
Victoria Triece is an influencer on social media since 2016 and has now more than 150,000 Instagram followers, 272,000 Tiktok followers, and finally 32,000 Twitter followers. But the problem was when she started an OnlyFans account, which is considered as an adult website. So anyone who makes money out of this website is considered as a sex worker. And that’s why Sand Lake Elementary School banned her from volunteering, even though she’d spent five doing it without any problem.
That’s even more frustrating because she has been helping a community for 5 years and is now banned from being able to do it because she does something legal. Because yes, let’s no forget that Onlyfans is a legal job, she has done nothing that could possibly be punished by the law, she is even a perfect citizen on paper. That’s why she declared: ‘I was humiliated, and I should not, and no one else should be concerned about what another parent does, I just love spending time with my kids and I have a great relationship with other parents and students.’
Voir cette publication sur Instagram
Her lawyer started her defense by saying that the County acts like ‘morality police’. He compares Victoria’s Onlyfans to many other situations that are not punished like cheating on his/her husband/wife or hunting endangered species. He says these two situations are much less moral but are not punished contrary to Victoria’s Onlyfans. He then adds: ‘Does that mean that parents and teachers who have violated their marriage vows shouldn’t be around children, is that immoral?’
He also said that many other parents in the County are involved with the website and that they gave him their full support in this case: ‘The obvious purpose of attempting to rally support for [the school board] ended up boomeranging on them’. Mom of two kids, Victoria started volunteering when she gave birth to her first kid. When she found out that she loves helping her own kids, she wanted to do the same for all the others. She loves volunteering and this banishment has been very hard for her. She even kept donating to the school even though she was banished from volunteering, and her lawyer said it was a disgrace to accept the money without letting her do what she really wanted to. Now that you got the context, let’s find out if this situation is really unfair.
Is That Really Unfair To Be Banned For OnlyFans?
Let’s see what are the pros and cons in this case. First of all, yes, being a sex worker on Onlyfans is not very well seen in society. That’s a shame for them, but that’s how it is. And even though the actors try to change this point of view every day, people still think this is taboo to talk about it. So banishing someone from volunteering is hard yes, but kind of logical since most of the parents and people in the school’s staff think like everybody concerning the job. So yes, cheating on his husband/wife and hunting endangered species is worse than what Victoria does, but for common people, these two situations don’t justify a banishment from volunteering. Also, the problem is not only the Onlyfans, It’s all her social media where she posts pictures in underwear, that link to her Onlyfans. Parents and staff are scared that children, who can now have easy access to technology, go to Instagram on their parents’ Ipad, find out the Onlyfans, and subscribe with their parents’ credit card only to find out what the volunteer they are seeing all day at school is doing. And that’s the reason why she is banished.
Voir cette publication sur Instagram
Now, Victoria should have never been banished over something ‘immoral’. Laws have been created so that people can know what to do and what to avoid doing. Here, Victoria has done nothing wrong and is not responsible for parents not protecting their children from technology enough. If the children end up on her Onlyfans or Instagram page, It’s not her fault, It’s the parents’ fault who have not been able to restrict access to certain apps (Yes it is possible today). And let’s be honest, only irresponsible parents will let their children with technology in their hands without checking what they are doing on it. These people are blaming Victoria for their irresponsibility, and what she does in private doesn’t concern them at all, since it is legal.
So, what is your opinion now? This is only the beginning of this interesting story and once we have new updates about it, we’ll keep you posted.
